-
The ruling marks the first major defeat for OTA in lawsuits seeking to derail its plan for a $5 billion, bond-financed extension project.
December 2 -
Property owners in the path of a $5 billion highway extension and the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority are fighting over whether state statutes allow for the issuance of bonds for the project.
November 21 -
The city's mayor says clarity is needed on debt issuance practices in the wake of the ruling.
November 11 -
A Texas judge ruled the Amarillo City Council did not provide sufficient notice to the public prior to its approval of $260 million of tax anticipation notes.
November 1 -
The operator of the South Terminal said it expects to prove hundreds of millions of dollars in damages caused by the city of Austin's "unlawful actions."
October 21 -
Opponents of Oklahoma Turnpike extensions are calling for limits on the agency's ability to issue bonds and raise tolls.
October 3 -
The Utah Inland Port Authority, which sold $150 million of bonds in December, asked the audit team to provide direction on potential risks.
September 22 -
The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority has asked the state Supreme Court to validate bonds that would commence funding for a $5 billion, 15-year extension project.
September 9 -
A three-judge panel reversed a district court's ruling in favor of the city's Firefighters' Relief and Retirement Fund that the law was unconstitutional.
August 31 -
A county judge ruled that a lawsuit alleging Open Meeting Act violations on the part of the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority will remain in his court unless the state supreme court chooses to exercise original jurisdiction.
August 17