For reasons lost to history, Congress expressly forbids the territory of Puerto Rico from using the municipal bankruptcy provisions of federal law known as Chapter 9. Now that Puerto Rico's public agencies face a debt crisis, U.S. lawmakers are considering a bill that would change the rules in the middle of the game.
Excluding Puerto Rico from Chapter 9 serves no discernable public policy purpose. It is perfectly appropriate for Congress to treat Puerto Rico like a state for purposes of municipal bankruptcy law. However, subjecting Puerto Rico's existing creditors — including banks and bondholders — to the law would be unfair.
Chapter 9 permits cities, counties and certain state-created corporations to file for federal bankruptcy protection, so long as the state agrees. In recent years, the cities of Detroit and Stockton, Calif., have both used Chapter 9 to restructure debts owed to bondholders and city retirees.
A current House bill
Earlier this month, a federal court
The problem with the House bill is that Puerto Rico's existing creditors presumably offered credit based on the default risks at the time. For example, the power authority's bondholders surely relied on the availability of local and contractual remedies in the event of a default.
Extending Chapter 9 to Puerto Rico would change these rules retroactively — and it is likely that some creditors would fare better under local Puerto Rico law than under a Chapter 9 proceeding.
Creditors are entitled to the benefit of the bargain they made with Puerto Rican public agencies. Altering the rules at this point could amount to picking winners and losers based on political expediency.
Therefore Congress should amend federal law to allow Puerto Rican entities to avail themselves of federal bankruptcy protection. But the amendment should only apply to future transactions in which creditors will be able to consider their likely treatment under Chapter 9 before lending money.
John McMickle is the founder of JDM Public Strategies, a consulting firm that works in financial services and government relations. He served as the bankruptcy counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee from 1994 to 2001. Follow him on Twitter