The Wyoming House of Representatives has become the latest GOP state to introduce a bill banning firms that are deemed to have used environmental, social or governance factors in their investment decisions.
State of Wyoming
Wyoming has become the latest state to float legislation that restricts state funds from being invested with firms that consider environmental, social or governance factors in their actions or investment strategies.
Two of the state's largest funds warned the bill would shrink the universe of asset managers willing to partner with the state and thus decrease their revenues.
The Wyoming House of Representatives introduced the Stop ESG-State Funds Fiduciary Duty Act on Jan. 2. The bill prohibits the investment of state funds with asset managers that have taken ESG-related actions or considered ESG factors in their investment strategies. The legislation says state funds can only consider "financial purposes," and cannot include "any action taken, or factor considered, by a fiduciary or trustee with any purpose whatsoever to further social, political or ideological interests."
A fiscal note accompanying the bill notes that the State Treasurer's Office and the Wyoming Retirement System said the bill, if enacted, would decrease their revenues "primarily as a result of a smaller universe of investment managers willing to partner with Wyoming to provide investment opportunities."
The Wyoming Retirement System estimated its pension fund would lose $193 million in fiscal year 2026, $387 million in 2027 and $580 million in 2028 compared to the status quo, which includes outperformance relative to the WRS reference portfolio.
The Treasurer's office did not estimate the impact.
The note added that the bill's administrative impact "appears to increase duties or responsibilities of one or more state agencies and may impact agency spending or staffing requirements."
The treasurer's office, retirement system and Republican state Rep. Christopher Knapp, who introduced the bill, did not respond to requests for comment.
It's the latest bill to be floated by Republican states seeking to block firms that are perceived as considering ESG factors. In the Midwest, Ohio passed a law barring state pension funds from investing based on ESG factors and in December, the Indiana Public Retirement System moved to dismiss BlackRock from managing its assets due to concerns over the firm's ESG commitments. In the Southwest, Texas,Oklahoma and Kansas have passed anti-ESG laws, and the Southeast, Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Georgia and North Carolina have passed similar laws, according to the Anti-ESG Bill Tracker from Pleiades Strategy.
Responses to an MSRB request for comment indicated broad support for an option designed to modernize delivery of municipal fund securities disclosure documents, but there was less unanimity regarding the need for a stand-alone time of trade disclosure rule.
The lawsuit argues the International Emergency Economic Powers Act that Trump invoked to impose tariffs does not grant the president the ability to unilaterally adopt tariffs on goods imported to the U.S.
Investors pulled $1.258 billion from municipal bond mutual funds in the week ending Wednesday, following $3.302 billion of outflows the prior week, according to LSEG Lipper data.
With the threat to tax exempt municipal bonds looming in a Congress searching for pay-fors, private activity bonds supporting hospitals and higher education are high on the list of potential first targets.
