The embattled Oklahoma Turnpike Authority will halt work on a controversial $5 billion expansion project until its access to the municipal bond market is assured.
The work stoppage effective Friday comes as the OTA faces an investigative state audit, litigation by property owners opposed to the project, and legislation that would impact the selection and actions of its board members.
The agency is also awaiting a decision by the Oklahoma Supreme Court on the validity of $500 million of revenue bonds to jumpstart funding for the 15-year ACCESS (Advancing and Connecting Communities and Economies Safely Statewide) Oklahoma plan.
"While OTA remains in a strong financial position in large part due to our exceptional accounting practices and financial controls in place, it is no longer prudent to continue funding work without a clear timetable for access to the bond market," Tim Gatz, who is the turnpike authority director and state transportation secretary, said in a memo this week to the agency's board.
Even if the bonds are validated, "ongoing litigation could also have a significant impact on OTA's ability to get favorable interest rates and could affect a decision to move forward with a bond offering," Gatz said in a separate memo to project consultants Tuesday.
He added the scope and timetable of the state audit would have to be assessed by investment advisors to determine its impact on the bond sale.
Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond ordered the audit in March,
Drummond on Tuesday said news of the work stoppage was concerning, causing him to "question the (OTA's) leadership and cash flow management."
"While it is unclear what the future holds for OTA, I am certain that the investigative audit I have ordered is needed now more than ever," he said in a statement.
Turnpike expansion opponents cheered the OTA's decision.
"It is neither lawful nor appropriate for the OTA to continue to work on the legally unauthorized East West Connector, South Extension, or Tri-City Connector proposed new turnpike routes," Amy Cerato, president of Pike Off OTA, said in a statement.
Property owners in the path of turnpike extensions sued the OTA last year claiming they were blindsided by the project or that planned routes lacked legislative authorization.
In December, a district court judge found OTA "willfully"
A second lawsuit, claiming bond financing and building of three routes violate state statute,
If the high court validates the bonds, OTA would need to return to the state's Council of Bond Oversight because that body's
Last year,
Meanwhile,