![Texas Gov. Greg Abbott at a Feb. 5 White House governors’ meeting.](https://arizent.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/3aa0690/2147483647/strip/true/crop/4000x2667+0+0/resize/740x493!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsource-media-brightspot.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com%2Fa4%2F52%2F6b09adbe4e82a2859ccd75166583%2F426441220.jpg)
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wants to pour billions of dollars into efforts to address water infrastructure and supply woes in order to sustain the state's growing population and economy.
In his State of the State address this month, the Republican governor declared water one of
"We will make the largest investment in water in the history of Texas," Abbott said. "We will tap into new water supplies and repair pipes to save billions of gallons of water each year."
To ensure Texas has enough water for the next 50 years, his plan would invest in existing rural programs and in strategies to develop supply with measures like desalination and water transport.
The state is already in talks with Houston to purchase the city's excess water and transport it to west Texas, which is currently
The 2025 legislative session could be one of the most consequential for water infrastructure this century, according to Texas 2036, a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy research and advocacy group.
"The great news is that House and Senate budget writers have released introduced versions of their respective budgets that include $2.5 billion for water infrastructure funding," Jeremy Mazur, the group's director of infrastructure and natural resources policy, said in a blog post. "This initial proposed amount is already historic: never before has the legislature proposed a water funding package of this magnitude."
A recent report by Rice University's Baker Institute, which was commissioned by Texas 2036,
Texas voters in November 2023 approved a constitutional amendment creating a $1 billion water fund with at least 25% of the money allocated to a New Water Supply for Texas Fund to finance projects leading to 7 million acre feet of additional water supply by the end of 2033.
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is once again pushing a plan to treat brackish water from aquifers, or from oil and natural gas production, making it available for industrial and other uses, including battling wildfires.
"Our state, like so many others, is facing a severe water shortage, and climate change is only making the problem worse," the Democratic governor said in her Jan. 21 State of the State address. "Yet we have enormous reserves of brackish water lying beneath our feet."
House Bill 137's Strategic Water Supply Act would establish a framework for the state to
The measure would appropriate just over $100 million for program development, aquifer mapping, and research, funded by a five-cent-per-barrel fee on water produced from oil and gas wells, he added.
It differs from
Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, who raised concerns about the state's dwindling water supply in her Jan. 15 State of the State address, proposed a $30 million funding boost to safeguard it in her fiscal 2026 budget.
"Forget making it 75 years down the road — some parts of western Kansas don't have the groundwater to last another 25 years," she said. "And without that water, the agricultural industry that fuels our economy and sustains our rural way of life cannot survive."
Not all Southwest states have money to back a hunt for water.
Tight budget conditions in Arizona have halted additional appropriations for the state's long-term water augmentation fund, although a quest for projects to bring new supply to the state continues.
In her State of the State address last month, Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs said "securing our water future is essential to preserving our way of life," but her proposed fiscal 2026 budget includes no money for the fund, which was created in 2022 by the Republican-controlled legislature with appropriations to total
"As usual, the governor talks a big game on water but does little to prioritize the solutions that matter," Republican State Rep. Gail Griffin, who chairs the House Natural Resources, Energy & Water Committee, said in a statement.
As a result of budget cutting, the fund only contains about $450 million.
A resolution introduced in the House states that when budget conditions improve "the legislature commits to working with the Water Infrastructure Finance Authority to
WIFA
Chelsea McGuire, WIFA's interim director, said the agency requested a "do-no-harm" funding approach after losing money in a funds sweep for the fiscal 2025 budget and will have "tangible" funding requests in the future as projects are identified through the solicitation process.
"We designed it with the understanding that additional resources were unlikely and we are confident that we have sufficient resources to get us through the solicitation and the vetting/feasibility analysis that will follow," she said.
The latest U.S. Drought Monitor shows