Puerto Rico Gov. Pedro Pierluisi has reluctantly agreed to the Puerto Rico Oversight Board's three main demands concerning its Act 52 replacement tax on foreign firms, which allows its enactment to replace Act 154.
The tax accounts for 16% of the island's general fund.
The board earlier this month
The board's demands included the creation of a $250 million reserve fund; a reduction of the maximum value of the conservation easement tax credit; and freezing implementation of a physician tax incentive.
Act 154 is an excise tax on the revenues of foreign corporate subsidiaries based in Puerto Rico, which will be financially untenable as a result of a U.S. Treasury change effective Jan. 1.
Calling Puerto Rico's economic development a main objective of his administration, and in an effort to provide "certainty to our economic environment ... the government confirms that it will adopt the measures recommended by the board," Pierluisi wrote in a letter to Board President David Skeel.
Pierluisi called "excessive" the requirement that his government create a $250 million reserve against possible shortfalls in Act 52's revenues and keep it until Dec. 31, 2025.
Act 52 would have increased the conservation easement tax credit to $15 million from $3 million, but the board opposed this and made Pierluisi reject it. As for the physician tax incentives, it won't be implemented until the addition of "guardrails" to prevent potential negative revenue impacts.
In a different conflict between the board and Pierluisi, the
Pierluisi seemed resigned to the suit, as he told the El Nuevo Día news web site Sunday, "We are going to litigate it. ... It makes all the sense in the world that we improve the employment offer, that there be a reasonable vacation period for all employees in Puerto Rico, including those in the private sector. And the changes that were made are not radical, they are measured, and what they are looking for is to make it more attractive to work."
Act 41 imposes "new restrictions on employers [that] will deter new hiring, adversely affect the labor market, harm the economy, and have a negative impact on commonwealth [government] revenues," according to the board.