Pennsylvania court ruling means budget trouble in Scranton

An appellate court dismissed Scranton’s appeal of a ruling that the city’s home-rule charter does not supersede a state cap on tax collection.

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania's ruling means the case will return to the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, where Judge James Gibbons will make a final determination. Gibbons in October agreed with the cap, while allowing city attorneys to appeal to the state court in Harrisburg.

Scranton
A road leading into downtown Scranton, Pennsylvania, U.S., is pictured on Sunday, Oct. 12, 2008. Scranton, whose economy shriveled as mining, railroad and factory jobs evaporated, has become the iconic hardscrabble American community in the U.S. presidential campaign, home to working-class families with old-fashioned values, struggling to pay bills. Photographer: Mike Mergen/Bloomberg News
MIKE MERGEN/BLOOMBERG NEWS

In a decision that could cost the distressed city about $50 million, Gibbons ruled in favor of eight taxpayers led by independent mayoral candidate Gary St. Fleur, who argued that Scranton has been collecting taxes beyond the legal limit.

The group filed the lawsuit in March and Gibbons held a hearing in Scranton on May 30.

The city maintained that Scranton’s home-rule charter exempts it from taxation limits under Pennsylvania’s Act 511, a so-called local tax enabling act.

“Whether it does is immaterial because Act 511 clearly and indisputably applies to the city of Scranton,” Gibbons said in October. “Act 511 denies Scranton the right to repeatedly levy and collect taxes in excess of its prescribed cap without taking further steps. As such, we will not change our conclusion that the home rule charter law is subservient to Act 511.”

St. Fleur expects Gibbons’ final determination to be a formality.

“This means that the judge, who already agrees with the cap, can now impose it on the city,” he said.

St. Fleur said the case could resonate throughout Pennsylvania.

Moody’s Investors Service has called the original ruling a credit negative for Scranton. “It may reduce tax revenue, which is a vital funding source for the city's operations,” Moody’s said in a commentary.

Scranton, a 76,000-population county seat in northeast Pennsylvania, raised the levy from $52 to $156 for every person working within the city limits who earns at least $15,600. City officials called the tax increases essential for their recovery under the state-sponsored Act 47 for distressed communities, to which Scranton has belonged since 1992.

Scranton, whose bonds are junk, received a general obligation upgrade from S&P Global Ratings in August to BB-plus from BB. The new rating is one level below investment grade.

The group, consisting of residents and all subject to the local tax, consists of St. Fleur, Nicholas Gettel, Casey Durkin, Damian Biancerelli, Rich Johnson, Ethan Green, Angela Gilgallon and Michele McGovern.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Budgets Lawsuits Pennsylvania
MORE FROM BOND BUYER